2010-Present: BW and CRT’s local mooring strategies for London and the K&A

As itinerant boaters face the double threat of license surcharges and extortionate ‘pre-bookable paid towpath moorings’, it is worth reminding ourselves that when we faced similar challenges in the past, our protests were successful. 

In 2010, British Waterways (who were later succeeded by CRT), introduced ‘local mooring strategies’ in London and the West end of the Kennet and Avon. They claimed that ‘more boats are moored along the river Lea than desirable’ and tried to implement a set of rules that would make it near impossible for most itinerant boaters to live in these areas. 

British Waterways, in an attempt to make the river Lea less popular for boaters, tried to define the word ‘place’ in the following statute: the vessel ‘will be used bona fide for navigation throughout the [license period] without remaining continuously in any one place for more than 14 days or such longer period as is reasonable in the circumstances.’ (BW Act 1995, Section 17)

They claimed that a ‘place’ is the same as a neighbourhood and then defined enormous stretches of the waterways as one neighbourhood. In London, the entire length of the river Stort became two ‘neighbourhoods’ (and almost entirely seven day mooring only); all waterways in London south of the North Circular became one neighbourhood, including Limehouse cut and the Hertford Union; the Lea north of the north circular was split into three neighbourhoods. 

Having redefined the meaning of the word ‘place’, British Waterways declared that itinerant boaters had to move to a new neighbourhood each 14 days and would have to spend an equal amount of time in each neighbourhood across the licence period. 

Against this unfair attempt to cleanse the river Lea of itinerant boaters, hundreds of boaters protested. It was at this time that London Boaters, originally a protest group, formed. They got information about the changes out to residents, rowers, canoers, cyclists and surveyed boaters and towpath users. They encouraged responses to the consultation and demonstrated that, far from being unwanted on the Lea, itinerant boats were welcome. 

London Boaters also challenged the legality of BW’s proposals  and worked with other boating organisations such as NABO (National Association of Boat Owners) and RBOA (Residential Boat Owners’ Association). They conducted their own research which challenged BW’s unsupported claims about congestion and examined the likely impact of the proposals, which would increase homelessness and put pressure on local housing waiting lists. They showed that the changes would prevent boaters accessing education, employment and health care.

Eventually, in September 2011, British Waterways realised the game was up and announced that it was dropping its plans for London. But, they were implemented by the newly formed Canal and River Trust in a 12 month trial in 2014 on the K&A.

On the K&A, similar to the ‘neighbourhoods’ idea, they set a maximum length of time that could be stayed on each stretch of the canal. They also planned to implement a charge of £25 a day for staying longer than stated on a less-than-14 day visitor mooring and introduced a 20 mile minimum distance. If boaters couldn’t abide by these draconian rules,  CRT offered ‘roving mooring permits’ (£800 a year for a 60ft boat) which enabled the boater to move every 14 or 28 days. While CRT eventually conceded that the ‘roving mooring permits’ were illegal , many of these requirements will be familiar to itinerant boaters across the country as they have since been rolled out in guidance to all boaters. The parallels between the new ‘constant-cruiser’ surcharge and the ‘roving mooring permits’ might also be noted. BW backed down in London because boaters dedicated a huge amount of time and energy to fighting their cause, but CRT re-used the same ideas on the K&A some years later and are re-using them again now in the introduction of the itinerant boater surcharge and the pre-payable visitor moorings in London. We must stick together and stay united in our opposition to their incessant attacks on our way of life – attacks which have been defended against before and can be defended against again.


    NBTA London needs your support to carry on our work. Please get in touch here if you would like to volunteer with us. Alternatively your donations are vital to us supporting boaters with their legal case work, campaign banners and other printed material as well as events. You can help us with your donations online here


    One thought on “2010-Present: BW and CRT’s local mooring strategies for London and the K&A”

    1. Hello,

      It does not, and never has done, helped the cause of boat owners to keep using phrases such as Itinerant Boaters and Continuous Cruisers.

      Every time these phrases and the many others that were dreamed up by British Waterways when they began the assault, on boat owners, and that is exactly what it has been, and has been carried out, an assault on boat owners who purchased a boat to sail the inland waterways, licensed the boat and insured the boat and every 4 years had it tested for the boat safety scheme so that it was legal and safe to use in full compliance with the rules and regulations that covered the inland waterways.

      We are all boat owners, we all pay our necessary fees and such like to keep our boats and boat owners legal and in full compliance with the inland waterways.

      I have never been itinerant and I have never been a continuous cruiser, I have sailed the inland waterways adhering and following the rules the same as all inland waterways boat owners, and in doing so, as with many boat owners who use the waterways more that the weekend boaters and boat cleaners and polishers who do not want to have dirty boats, or scratched paintwork boats through sailing, as is their right to do so, hogging and taking up space preventing regular boat users from accessing marinas for fuel and supplies, that is how easy it is to spread false ideas and rumours!

      And that is exactly how British Waterways split the boating community, by divide and conquer, helped by the adopting and use of their phrases!

      WE ARE ALL BOAT OWNERS, AND THAT IS THE PREMISE THAT MUST BE MAINTAINED

      WE ARE ALL BOAT OWNERS WHOI HAVE BEEN ATTACKED AND VICTIMISED BY THE INLAND WATERWAYS AUTHORITIES WHO DID SO BY BRITISH WATERWAYS FIRST OF ALL CREATING A 2 AND 3 TIERED SYSTEM TO JUSTIFY THE ATTACKS ON REGULAR BOAT USERS AND SAILERS, WHO ALSO PREVENTED MANY DANGEROUS INCIDENTS WHEN SAILING AND ALL THE PRETTY BOATS WERE TIED UP TO KEEP THEM CLEAN WHEN SPOTTING THE BEGINIGS OF BREACHES THAT WERE THEN STOPPED BEFORE THEY GREW OUT OIF CONTROL, AND ALL THE MANY OTHER DAMAGE IUNCIDENTS WE HAVE REPORTED AND PREVENTED INCIDENTS, SUCH AS THE LATEST ON THE BRIDGEWATER AND SAVING MANY MILLIONS OF POUNDS IN COSTLY REPAIRS

      AND NOW THE BRITISH WATERWAYS SUCCESSORS WHO HAVE THE CANAL AND RIVER TRUST WHO HAVE DEVIOUSLY REMOVED AND GOT RID OF THE RULES THAT ACTUALLY PROTECTED BOAT OWNERS AND NOW ALLOWS THEM TO ACT WITH INPUNITY AND DO WHATEVER THEY WANT.

      THE BRITISH WATERWAYS SCHEME OF GETTING RID OF INLAND WAYTERWAYS BOATS DRAWS NEARER ALONG WITH THE ENDLESS LENGTHS OF LINEAR WATERWAYS PARKS JOINED TOGETHER BY LOCAL AUTHORITY FOOTPATHS AND CYCLEWAYS IN THE MAIN HELPED BY THE INFIGHTING CREATED AND STARTED BY BRITISH WATERWAYS

      IS IT TOO LATE, I AM NOT SURE, BUT UN LESS THE INFIGHTING STOPS AND ALL BOAT OWNERS COME TOGETHER TO FIGHT THIS SCOURGE CARRIED OUT BY THE CANAL AND RIVER TRUST WILL SURELY FINISH WHAT BRITISH WATERWAYS STARTED

      Kind regards

      Malcolm Hutton Full Time Boat Owner And Sailor Who Loves The Waterways But Is Been Driven Off

      On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 16:41, National Bargee Travellers Association – Lond

      Like

    Leave a reply to allpoliticiansareliars Cancel reply